Q: When is an introduction not an introduction?

A: When it’s a spoiler.

I’ve been reading a lot of classics over the last couple of years, filling in the gaps on The List, and the spoiler-introduction is something I’ve come across a few times. I’m here to say: I don’t like it.

For anyone who doesn’t know what I mean, I’m talking about editions of a book where the publishers have hired some renowned intellectual to provide an introduction to the novel, setting the scene in terms of the time period, the author’s life or whatever else they feel is relevant. These introductions can be quite interesting but more often than not they also  contain details of the plot which would otherwise have been a surprise and can be central to building suspense and telling the story properly.

Now I understand that a lot of the classic stories are so well known that you might expect people to already know what happens in the end and this is often true. For example, I haven’t yet read Pride & Prejudice but I have a fair idea that a certain Ms Bennett and a certain Mr Darcy are probably going to come across each other at some point. But this doesn’t mean that I want the intricate plot details spelled out before I’ve even started. 

I’m sure many of you out there will agree when I say that I hate spoilers. One of the low points of my reading career was when a schoolfriend who’d got hold of one of the Harry Potter books before me said she would “just tell me the initials” of the person who died. An entire book ruined ladies and gentlemen (and a friendship on the rocks).

I’ve spent every Wednesday for the last few weeks with my fingers in my ears in case someone gives away the result of The Great British Bake Off.

Are you getting it? I hate spoilers!

So I really, really, really hate it when some well meaning publisher ruins a plot right at the front of the book. The first few times I picked up a book with an introduction I would read it  as a way to prolong the delicious anticipation before diving into the text but after The Green Mile I learnt my lesson.

The thing is that these introductions do contain interesting points and these days I often go back and read them once I’m done with the story so I’m not against the content per se I just think they should be at the back of the book so that we aren’t fooled into reading them too early.

This morning I started The Casebook of Sherlock Holmes and in this case the introduction was preceded by a warning from the publisher to read the book before the introduction if you value “surprises, secrets and revelations that all narratives contain”. If I value them? I’m reading a mystery book, I would say that’s elementary my dear Watson. I appreciate the warning but wouldn’t it make more sense to move the introduction to the other end of the volume to prevent any unnecessary upset?

In a similar vein I’ve often had plot details revealed by the notes section. You flip to the back expecting the explanation of a quote or an unfamiliar word and instead are told that this sentence preshadows Mr So-and-So’s demise in a poetic fashion. Well thanks very much.

Spoilers are everywhere and it’s incredibly hard to avoid them so I could really do without having them forced on me in this manner. Bah! Humbug! (Said someone, in some book but far be it from me to tell you who.)


7 responses to “Q: When is an introduction not an introduction?

  1. I hate spoilers too! I will hide people on facebook for any leaked details of films, books or tv shows (that’s unless I decide to unfriend them.) I remember the first time I read through the entire series of my favourite manga. I was 5 or 6 books away from the end and there was something that I was looking up on the internet related to it which led me to read something so spoilerific that I actually ended up crying a little bit. I love it when a plot twist is revealed as I read (or watch) that I wasn’t expecting. It’s such a delicious feeling which I feel robbed of just because some smarty-pants wants to show off how cool they are that they’ve read/watched something before me. It makes me intensely angry.

  2. You go girl! Completely agree and I was nodding my head enthusiastically all the way through. WHY WOULD YOU PUT SPOILERS IN THE INTRO? WHY. Stupid peopleeeeeeeeee.

    Spoilers are the bane of my existence.

  3. I always leave the intro until I’m finished reading the book to avoid any possible spoilers. What a way to ruin Harry Potter for you. 😦

    • I do now as well but that often means I forget to read it as I’m recovering from the emotion of the big finish. Sometimes it’s nice to have a bit more of the book to read though so there’s pros and cons.

      I was so angry (as you can possibly tell from the fact that it happened over 10 years ago and I’m still going on about it!), but it made me one of those people who had to get hold of the book straight away and read it all before speaking to anyone!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s